вот, нашел собственные описания chateau la lagune 2000. странным образом, дегустация 2004 и 2007 года показывает огромную и тревожную разницу. не могло же одно и то же вино за 3 года в бутылке превратиться из густого пурпурного (17.5 баллов за букет, и "пусть еще полежит лет 10!") в "удивительно светлое" и "бесхарактерное" (16 баллов):
Chateau La Lagune (Haut-Médoc) 2000: A surprisingly light colour, and not giving a lot away on the nose. The oak is evident, with a little spice, but otherwise no real character. The palate is full, creamy, rounded but obviously closed down. It has a good presence and texture, but with no other character showing at present it s difficult to judge. This should not be taken as a definitive opinion of this wine. 15.5-16.5+?/20 (February 2007)
Chateau La Lagune (Haut-Médoc) 2000: A glossy, red-purple hue. Dense, pure and powerful fruit on the nose. The same on the palate, with spice and exotic fruit. It has structure, creamy texture and correct acidity. Lovely, but so immature. Needs 10-20 years in the cellar. 17.5+/20 (January 2004)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
branchandroot
no subject
Date: 2009-09-21 04:53 pm (UTC)